Mathis Bondaz vs Alexander Frusina Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 09 Oct at 04:14 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Bondaz vs A. Frusina

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Bondaz 1 - 0 Frusina
They have played 2 sets in total, with Mathis Bondaz winning 2 and Alexander Frusina winning 0. The last match between Mathis Bondaz and Alexander Frusina was at the M15 Lexington, 09-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Mathis Bondaz getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Bondaz | 1 |
| Frusina | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Lexington(10-09-25)
M. Bondaz vs A. Frusina H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 53.85% (21-18) | Career Total W/L | 37.25% (19-32) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Bondaz vs A. Frusina Match Preview:
- How do Mathis Bondaz and Alexander Frusina compare on second serve performance? Recently, Frusina leads with 42.33% of points won compared to Bondaz's 36.06%.
- Bondaz excels in return games, capturing 45.95% of opponents' second serve points, while Frusina captures 38.41%.
- In first serve returns, Bondaz holds the edge with 32.17% compared to Frusina's 23.90%.
- Under pressure, Frusina has saved 50% of breakpoints, slightly better than Bondaz's 45.57%.
- Over the past year, Bondaz has a higher win percentage (68.75%) than Frusina (60.00%).
- On their favored surfaces, Bondaz excels on Hard courts with a 67% win rate, whereas Frusina performs best on Clay with a matching 67% success rate.
- In the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, Bondaz outshines with a 73.33% win rate compared to Frusina's 60.00%.
- Bondaz has faced lower-ranked opponents (average rank of 428.88) compared to Frusina, who faced more challenging opponents with an average rank of 134.93.
- Does deciding set performance matter? Bondaz shines with a 67% win rate, while Frusina has not won any in the past year.
Editorial Prediction (October 9, 2025, UTC):
In this upcoming tennis matchup, Mathis Bondaz appears to have a slight edge based on several key statistics.
While Alexander Frusina shows a stronger recent performance on second serve points, Bondaz's superior return game could be a decisive factor. His ability to break down opponent's serves, especially first serves, is a significant advantage.
Mathis Bondaz also excels under pressure, with a strong track record in deciding sets, which could be pivotal if the match is closely contested. Overall performance trends over the past year indicate Bondaz as a slightly more consistent player.
Despite these strengths, it is notable that Frusina has been competing against higher-ranked opponents, potentially offering more challenging preparation matches.
Accounting for these factors, Mathis Bondaz is likely to emerge victorious in this face-off.
Mathis Bondaz vs Alexander Frusina Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Bondaz vs A. Frusina H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:0:0 | Average Match Time | 2:0:0 |
| 65% (40/62) | 1st Serve % | 56% (45/80) |
| 63% (25/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 40% (18/45) |
| 55% (12/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (20/35) |
| 40% (6/15) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (4/12) |
| 53% (42/80) | Return Points Win % | 40% (25/62) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Bondaz Recent Matches Played
A. Frusina Recent Matches Played

M. Bondaz vs A. Frusina Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.85% (21/18) | YTD Win/Loss | 37.25% (19/32) |
| 52.94% (45/40) | Sets Win/Loss | 38.74% (43/68) |
| 52.75% (413/370) | Games Win/Loss | 45.35% (473/570) |
| 65.22% (15/8) | Hard Win/Loss | 36.00% (9/16) |
| 33.33% (3/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 41.67% (10/14) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 35 | Aces Total | 100 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.37 |
| 88 | Total Double Faults | 186 |
| 1:13:44 | Average Match Time | 1:20:32 |
| 408.82 | Average Opponent Rank | 337.69 |
| 61% (1033/1706) | 1st Serve % | 53% (1384/2607) |
| 59% (614/1033) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (876/1384) |
| 47% (318/673) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (553/1223) |
| 44% (101/231) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (97/234) |
| 44% (808/1830) | Return Points Win % | 39% (998/2545) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 55.26% (21/17) | Futures W/L | 40.43% (19/28) |
| 53% (20/38) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 38% (19/50) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 40% (2/5) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (6/12) |
| 50% (4/8) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (4/8) |
| 86% (22/19) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (20/17) |
| 14% (22/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (20/3) |
| 6% (17/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (31/2) |